Ethanol + Gasoline = Tropospheric Ozone ^nth ?
by Daniel Brouse
There is growing evidence that chemical reactions in the atmosphere are detrimental to the growing process.
Low level ozone, known as Tropospheric Ozone, has been shown to inhibit plant growth and can cause cell death. Tropospheric Ozone has also been proven to be harmful to human health causing respiratory ailments and death.
The chemistry involved in understanding Tropospheric Ozone is complex.
Tropospheric Ozone is harmful to life while Stratospheric Ozone is essential to protecting life. This point alone confuses many people. Tropospheric Ozone will never become Stratospheric Ozone. Tropospheric Ozone is “bad ozone” for the duration of its existence. The formation of Tropospheric Ozone occurs under certain conditions that include the combination of air pollutants, sunlight and heat. Auto emissions are a leading cause of human induced Tropospheric Ozone. Global warming is also a human induced contributor to the problem.
In certain cities, on hot, sunny summer days, an “Ozone Alert” is sounded and humans are advised not to go outside. Despite improved fuel efficiency, Tropospheric Ozone levels have not been declining. A massive impact on vegetation is now becoming evident.
Ethanol + Gasoline = Tropospheric Ozone ^nth ?
Over the past few years, ethanol has become a mandated additive to gasoline blends. An argument has been made that it helps reduce pollution. In some Pennsylvania counties, ethanol has been required in summer gas blends in an effort to reduce harmful emissions; however, this practice may be back-firing.
As early as 1999, scientist and environmentalists were questioning the effects of ethanol on ozone creation. A report in 2000 by David Morris and Jack Brondum of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance questions substituting ethanol for MTBE in gasoline. “Ethanol is an attractive fuel with many undisputed environmental and economic development benefits. Yet it suffers from one disadvantage. It raises the volatility of gasoline.”
At the time, this report was trying to suggest that the increased level of ozone was not a problem despite the fact that “Many in the environmental community vigorously oppose this (ethanol additive). They fear that increased hydrocarbon emissions lead to increased ozone levels and adverse public health impacts.”
Those lobbying for ethanol production used the Institute of Local Self-Reliance report to exempt ethanol from clean air emissions standards.
By 1994, the State Of California was in a battle with EPA over ethanol, gasoline and ozone. “If it can be shown that ethanol is creating another air quality issue, then the EPA can grant a waiver,” said EPA spokesman John Millett, who described the data being analyzed by engineers and scientists as “painstaking and technical.”
The article in the Orange County Business Journal, Jun 14-Jun 20, 2004 states, “State officials have argued for the past five years that the volatility of ethanol, a fuel blend made from corn that evaporates easily, contributes to smog by increasing ozone levels and adding particulates to the air.”
A 2007 study conducted by Mark Jacobson of the a Stanford University civil and environmental engineering department strengthened the argument against using ethanol in gasoline.
“It’s not green in terms of air pollution,” said Mark Jacobson. “If you want to use ethanol, fine, but don’t do it based on health grounds. It’s no better than gasoline, apparently slightly worse.You are really spreading out pollution over a larger area.”
The study notes the large number of deaths attributed to ozone pollution each year and estimates a 5% increase due to ethanol additives.
The impact on plant life is already evident as a higher percentage of trees and vegetation are experiencing ozone related cell damage and death over a larger area.
The answer is not just to stop using ethanol but to also stop using any fuel that contributes to ozone pollution.
10 Comments
Mom said:
Your article seems good.
In the sixth paragraph from end (I think) before “volatility” you could
delete to join to previous sentence.
Gail said:
Oh, yeah, I have a lot to add.
Thank you for asking. I will try to compile the latest and most pertinent research and forward it in the next day or two.
Ed said:
It’s all about finding new things to burn and then make money off of. I keep thinking about Star Treck these days — The Prime Directive. As a child, I remember my Mother saying Science Fiction becomes Reality within a generation. So, I am hoping we get there soon. What always seems to come back and bite us are the unintended consequences. They always seem to be bad when the motivation is greed. Sorry for blowing up!
Susan replied:
Who is the intended audience?
What can the average reader do?
Edie wrote:
Yes, I certainly want to see our environment as healthy as it can be, especially as one with asthma. What venue is this for?
Ruthanne said:
I surly will heed this warning, and send the message along to others that care.
Wally chimed in:
The article looks good as it is. Now, get it out to as many people as you can.
What next? We stop using ethanol in gas?
Gail sent in:
Ozone Quiz: http://www.wsl.ch/forest/products/ozone-en/
Photos of Ozone Injury in European Forest Species
Your region has the highest injury level:
EPA: Ozone Injury In Plants
University Of Minnesota: Entering the O(no!)zone
Ozone is the probably the most common and most damaging form of air pollution. It is a highly reactive form of oxygen that causes a variety of symptoms. Foliar symptoms include flecking (silver or bleached-out spots), tissue death between the veins, stipple (numerous tiny spots of yellow, light tan, red-brown, dark brown, red, black, or purple pigment), mottling (irregular blotches of green, light green, and yellow), yellowing, bronzing, or bleaching. Plant growth may be stunted if foliar symptoms are severe. Flowering and bud formation can be depressed or aborted.
Gail concluded:
I think it would be stronger if you provide footnotes with links where possible to all sources.
If in fact the principal culprit is ethanol that is actually good news, since we can just stop using it. Of course ozone is still a problem, but it’s so bad now, I can hardly believe my own eyes. I went to Princeton yesterday and those huge old trees look terrible, it’s so sad.
Rick noted:
I just got back from Maine last night and fortunately it hasn’t hit there yet….